The following is an anonymous, unedited op-ed.
West Point, the prestigious military academy, has recently made headlines for its decision to permanently shut down 12 clubs that supported underrepresented communities. This move aligns with the Department of Defense’s (DoD) whiplash-inducing policy changes on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), which claims to foster a more inclusive, merit-based environment within the military. However, the decision has sparked controversy, particularly regarding the inconsistency in its application.
The affected clubs focused on minority communities, including those representing Hispanic, Black, Asian, LGBTQIA+, and female cadets. Proponents of the closures argue that by dissolving these clubs, West Point is following orders intended to create a more equitable environment for all cadets. Critics, however, contend that this action disproportionately impacts underrepresented groups, especially since clubs connected to Caucasian or Eastern European heritage remain in place. This selective enforcement raises significant questions about the Academy’s true commitment to equality and equity.
Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) policies prevent favoring any one affinity group over another; requiring fair treatment of all employees across several protected categories and swift punishment for violations. Nonetheless the lived experiences of minority groups indicate that policies have historically been written or enforced in biased ways, whether unconsciously or maliciously. For example, unintentionally racist hair and grooming standards, sexist uniform policies, and practices like “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” forced honorable service members to warp or conceal their identities to serve. These examples underscore the necessity of empowering minority voices to eliminate barriers for fully qualified, merit-based service. If merit is the intent, then removing barriers to the most qualified, meritorious candidates should be the policy. Not silencing voices that advocate for such inclusivity.
Open-source media platforms like The Military Times and Task & Purpose have reported backlash from students, alumni, and the public. They argue that these closures undermine military readiness and resilience. This is particularly concerning when we consider the work required to counter real threats from peer competitors like China and Russia. Diversity within the military fosters tactical, operational, and strategic creativity, enhancing problem-solving abilities, and complicating enemy decision-making. Notable examples include the Code Talkers of World War II, who provided critical operational security through their unique cultural background, and the 6888th Battalion, which solved logistical problems that their white, male counterparts failed to address.
Many believe these West Point clubs provide essential support and community for cadets from diverse backgrounds, fostering a sense of belonging and representation within the military. This, in turn, aids in readiness, resilience, and retention. The situation at West Point reflects a broader national discussion surrounding the dissolution of DEI initiatives and the potential losses that may arise in times of international hostility and complex challenges. As the military continues to grapple with issues of recruiting, retention, readiness, and resilience, the need for open dialogue and comprehensive solutions becomes increasingly vital. The fate of these clubs serves as a poignant reminder of the delicate balance between rigid policy adherence and informed, nuanced decision-making. Ultimately, we hope that all civil servants remember their oath to the Constitution and their duty to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
